Associativity — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The order nobody fixed
The same eight summaries, combined pairwise in a tree or folded in one at a time, produce tables that differ on forty keys — the largest by 964 arrivals. Nothing in a deployment fixes which shape is used, and both answers are inside the guarantee.
What a fold charges per level
Thirty-two counter tables folded in a chain come out wrong by 323 where the same thirty-two combined pairwise are wrong by 148, and the quantile summaries prefer the chain by exactly as much in the other direction. What is being charged in each case is the depth of the fold, and the two families are charged on opposite ones.
The shape that moves the bill
Thirty-two quantile summaries combined pairwise keep 3,637 tuples and the same thirty-two folded in one at a time keep 2,616, for answers that differ by nothing at all. The counter tables measured for the same thing do the opposite — their order moves the answer and leaves the space alone.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
GuaranteeMerge treeMergeable summaryMisra–GriesShardSpace-savingHeavy hitterQuantile summaryTrade offDeterministic algorithmFixed pointGreenwald–Khanna