Depth cap — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The number that would choose a cap
A depth histogram is one linear pass — 3.16 operations a character over thirty-two thousand of them — and it says the whole text sits at a mean depth of 3.98 with a worst of ten. Nobody prints it, and every choice of cap in this collection was made without it.
The cap an automaton cannot see
A state of a suffix automaton stands for a set of occurrences and hands back one of them. So a capped parse driven by it can ask whether the earliest occurrence is shallow enough and cannot ask whether any occurrence is — which costs up to 9.8% of the phrases, and only at the caps that bind.
What a quadratic construction was setting
A depth cap of one costs 90% of an 8,192-character text in phrases, and 86% of a 65,536-character one. The ladder's conclusions hold at thirty-two times the size — and the number the ladder could not reach, the deepest chain a real collection produces, turns out to be fourteen.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Lempel zivMeasurementPhraseSuffix automatonTrade offConstructionExtractionParseRepetitionDefinitionEndposGreedy